Pastors
This is a place where pastors come for inspiration, encouragement, fellowship, practical help, experienced instruction, tools and resources for growing a healthy church, and a shared sense of vision and identity.
Search

Many think God's intervention can revive the dying

6

Rate Me
  • Waldo

  • Mon, Aug 18 2008
  • 2:11 PM
Article: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080818/ap_on_he_me/med_god_vs_doctors;_ylt=ArFQ29E4OPH6F8jh.gD1SnOs0NUE

 Thought this was interesting to read.  I myself have never had to make any tought decisions such as those who are near death. 

11 Replies

    • bryanm

    • Tue, Aug 19 2008
    • 1:05 PM

     I was part of the decision to take my brother off life support, and I hold medical power of attorney for my mom.  I have really struggled with this issue, and finally have become a bit of a fatalist.  If God wants them, they are not there, no matter what the machines say.  If God doesn't want them yet, turning the machines off won't make a hill of beans difference.

    I don't know how sophisticated that is, but its the best I can do for now.

     
  • My hospice work (and just plain ol' pastoral work) has placed me near quite a few of those kinds of decisions.

    Bottom Line:  Let's see - Enoch didn't die.  Elijah didn't die.  There are 6 billion people alive now.  Let's say that over the course of human history there have been 20 billion people. 

    I'm not a mathematician, but wouldn't that make the odds of not dying 1 in 10,000,000,000?  That pretty much means that the odds are we all eventually die, right?

     

     
    • Jack

    • Wed, Aug 20 2008
    • 10:41 AM

     I don't think either of the two posts thus far adequately addresses the issue of the miracle of healing.  Both answers seem simplistic and do not take into account the full teaching of God's Word.

    The issue certainly is not about "cheating death" completely.  The Word says we will all die -- but even with that text there is the ambiguity of what about those believers alive when Jesus comes.

    The issue of God's sovereignty is certainly something to be considered.  Yet, there is some ambiguity here also because the Scripture mentioned several times that God changed His mind in response to prayer.  Scholars and skeptics dance around the clear language of Scripture to try to erase the ambiguity, but the answers are usually quite inadequate.

    The clear teaching in Scripture in not a few places is that some people do not die when it appears they most surely will as a direct result of prayer.  It is the miracle of healing.  Sure, as Tony points out, such divine intervention is rare -- I think that is why it is called a miracle.  However, Tony's statistics are somewhat skewed because the Bible says directly that not everything the Lord did has been recorded.  Therefore, it is impossible to know exactly what the statistical ratio of people healed to people who were not healed truly is.

    As a Baptist I'm often at odds with some of my brethren because I believe strongly in the gift of healing.  The fact that the majority of people that I've prayed for have not received a miraculous healing (save that which comes by way of translation from this life) does not discount those who were healed contrary to all human expectations.  Nor does the fact that God sometimes (or as Tony points out many times) answer "no," destroy my belief in the power and providence of God to send any miracle any time He chooses.

    I've seen life support removed and the person die.  I've seen life support removed and the person live.  I do believe that whether we live or die, it is a matter of God's power and providence ultimately.  A couple of times I have watched a person remarkably and unexplainably rise from a bed of death.  When that happens, one's faith in God is greatly impacted.

    While I don't understand all of the how and why of healing nor the importance of statistical data, I do trust the straight-forward teaching of the Bible in both testaments that demonstrate God's power over death and life.

     
  • QUOTE: "I don't think either of the two posts thus far adequately addresses the issue of the miracle of healing.  Both answers seem simplistic and do not take into account the full teaching of God's Word."

    Actually, they are not simplistic at all.  The point of a miracle is that it is not common - otherwise it wouldn't be a miracle. 

    Even though it's true, saying that everything Jesus did wasn't recorded is a bit simplistic in itself. How far do you wanna take that argument? 

    It's a kind of "argument of silence" and it's never a good argument.  It's essentially the same argument that now has Jesus endorsing homosexual relationships because there's no recorded example of Him teaching against it, therefore He must have been for it.  On the other end of the spectrum, it's essentially the same argument the a capella crowd uses against having pianos in worship because there's no mention of it in the New Testament.

    I do believe in praying for the ill, in anointing them with oil, and looking for their healing, but the reversal of a health situation is still not the norm - hence the title "miracle."

     

     
  • Off topic: Jesus may have addressed it. Not saying he did, but I have recently read some talmudic scholars say that the "giving in marriage" part of the Noah reference of Jesus was actually a reference to homosexual marriage that was occurring at the time of the flood.

    We now return to our regularly scheduled topic.

     
    • Jack

    • Thu, Aug 21 2008
    • 1:39 PM

    tonyliston:
    I do believe in praying for the ill, in anointing them with oil, and looking for their healing, but the reversal of a health situation is still not the norm - hence the title "miracle."
     

    Tony, I think we were making the same point but from different angles.  Coming from a Baptist framework for 40 plus years I'd like to point out when most Baptists say, "miraculous healing is not the norm," it means for all practical purposes, miracles ended with the age of the apostles.

    For some, this cessationist view is a matter of settled theology.  For others, it is a matter of common practice.

    My suspicion is that God is ready and willing to do many more miraculous acts if He found more faith operating in the lives of His people.  I base this on several verses:

    Luke 5:20
    20 When Jesus saw their faith, he said, "Friend, your sins are forgiven."
    Luke 8:48
    8 Then he said to her, "Daughter, your faith has healed you. Go in peace."
    Matt 13:58
    58 And he did not do many miracles there because of their lack of faith.

    I don't present these as "proof texts" to justify any kind of "name it--claim it heresy."  I offer them as representative passages showing a relationship between faith and miraculous manifestations of God.  I realize this position might bring accusations of Arminianism.  If that is the case, I feel it was predestined to happen.

     
  • You may just hafta skip what I wrote in the last post.  It's not all that fluid.  I was multi-tasking with the phone, my daughter, a visitor from the Yellow Pages company, and an office volunteer - all on a very tight compressed schedule of the same five minutes.  It was poorly written and I don't even remember for sure what point I was trying to make. Embarrassed

     
    • Waldo

    • Thu, Aug 21 2008
    • 3:23 PM

     You are forgiven.  Did you buy some yellow pages' book?  Geeked

     
  • I am sure that everyone of us believe that God will and can do anything he desires to do.  I have been with grieving families who did not want to "pull the plug" and said they would rather have their young daughter without brain activity Kept alive."  I have heard Christians in our church who have been healed and have other members of their family healed of cancer because of James passage, that it was God's promise to answer that kind of prayer.  And watched a new widow with with four kids crying because of her lack of faith.  My suggestion is to  be very careful with how you present healing.

    $.02 worth Rod

     
    • Jack

    • Fri, Aug 22 2008
    • 1:49 PM

    Rod Wilgus:
    My suggestion is to  be very careful with how you present healing.
     

    I think I get what you are saying. I'm not sure I agree completely, though as I said, in light of all the frauds there are on the market I can appreciate your caution.

    On the other hand, growing up as a Baptist, caution was the norm.  In fact, it bordered on disbelief.  So, I'd caution people about being too cautious (is that spelled right?).

    The Bible seems to take the miraculous intervention of God in the life of man as something to be expected.  Skepticism in regard to the miraculous (to the degree it becomes practical disbelief) does not seem to fit the Scripture's teaching.  But, I do agree that we need to be discerning.

     
  • I agree with you that that miracles can definitely be downplayed, I have done that in the past.  But watching a woman dying of cancer who prayed, believed and contacted some of the most well-known healers around spent her last days on this earth feeling condemned because she did not have enough faith to be healed. 

    I also have a concern in some cases that some will forget that, "for me to live and to die is gain." 

    If I sound like I don't have it figured out it is because I don't.  This is one of the many tough situations we have to go through with people as pastors.  Thank you for your input.  I'm listening.

    Rod

     
Page 1 of 1 (12 items) | RSS